توضیحات
Joseph LaPorte offers a new account of the connections between the reference of words for properties and kinds, and theoretical identity statements. Some terms for concrete objects, such as ‘Hesperus’ and ‘Phosphorus,’ are rigid, and the rigidity of these terms is important because it helps to determine whether certain statements containing them, including identity statements like ‘Hesperus = Phosphorus’, are necessary or contingent. These observations command broad agreement. But there has been much less agreement about whether and how designators for properties are rigid: terms like ‘white’, ‘brontosaur’, ‘beautiful’, ‘heat’, ‘H2O’, ‘pain’, and so on. In Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities, LaPorte articulates and defends the position that terms for properties are rigid designators. Furthermore, he argues that property designators’ rigidity is put to good use in important philosophical arguments supporting and impugning certain theoretical identity statements. The book as a whole constitutes a broad defense of a tradition originating largely in seminal work from Saul Kripke, which affirms the truth and necessity of theoretical identities such as ‘water = H2O’, ‘heat = the motion of molecules’ and the like, and which looks skeptically upon psychophysical identities like ‘pain = c-fiber firing’. LaPorte responds to detractors of the Kripkean tradition whose objections and challenges indicate where development and clarification is needed, as well as to sympathizers who have put forward important contributions toward such ends. Specific topics discussed by way of defending the Kripkean tradition include conventionalism and empiricism, nominalism about properties, multiple realizability, supervenience, analytic functionalism, conceptual dualism and ‘new wave’ or a posteriori materialism, the explanatory gap, scientific essentialism (more broadly: scientific necessitarianism), and vitalism.
————————————————————–
ترجمه ماشینی :
جوزف لاپورت گزارش جدیدی از ارتباط بین ارجاع کلمات برای خواص و انواع و گزاره های هویت نظری ارائه می دهد. برخی از اصطلاحات برای اشیاء انضمامی، مانند «Hesperus» و «Phosphorus»، سفت و سخت هستند، و سختی این اصطلاحات مهم است زیرا به تعیین اینکه آیا عبارات خاصی حاوی آنها، از جمله گزارههای هویتی مانند «Hesperus = فسفر»، ضروری هستند یا خیر، مهم است. یا احتمالی این مشاهدات توافق گسترده ای دارند. اما توافق بسیار کمتری در مورد اینکه آیا و چگونه تعیینکنندههای خواص سفت و سخت هستند وجود داشته است: اصطلاحاتی مانند “سفید”، “برونتوسور”، “زیبا”، “گرم
tag : دانلود کتاب تعیین صلب و هویت های نظری , Download تعیین صلب و هویت های نظری , دانلود تعیین صلب و هویت های نظری , Download Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities Book , تعیین صلب و هویت های نظری دانلود , buy تعیین صلب و هویت های نظری , خرید کتاب تعیین صلب و هویت های نظری , دانلود کتاب Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities , کتاب Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities , دانلود Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities , خرید Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities , خرید کتاب Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities ,
نقد و بررسیها
هنوز بررسیای ثبت نشده است.